Case Study 1
HMRC opened a full corporation tax enquiry into a multimillion pound retailer with a number of high street outlets. The enquiry was complex and HMRC were seeking to demonstrate that there was a cash deficit in the business records, and the impact of this was that the potential tax assessments would have been a six figure sum. We performed detailed reconstruction of cash reconciliations to demonstrate that HMRC’s calculations were flawed. HMRC eventually accepted that there was no corporation tax due and the case was closed.
Case Study 2
HMRC opened a full enquiry into a takeaway business and made assessments of around £70,000 for VAT and income tax. The enquiry was being dealt with by their accountant. We were approached to take over the enquiry. We appealed the assessments and presented a detailed evidence based approach on the appeal with a business economics exercise model being presented together with a full rebuttal of HMRC’s assumptions. At the HMRC independent review stage the matter was concluded in our client’s favour and the case was settled for around £4,000.
Case Study 3
HMRC opened an aspect enquiry into a multimillion pound professional services firm. The enquiry was handled by their accountant and the enquiry reached an impasse as there were significant areas of disagreement with HMRC. The potential tax at stake was a large six figure sum. We were approached to take over the enquiry. We took a fresh approach and had detailed meetings with the HMRC officer and departmental heads to understand the key areas of concern. We reconstructed the accounts using a scenario based approach and presented those to HMRC and this resulted in the case being settled and the tax was less than 10% of the initial amounts.
Case Study 4
This was a tax evasion case that the Defendant pleaded guilty to but contested that the income and tax due per HM Revenue & Customs was significantly overstated. Therefore, for sentencing purposes we were asked to review the Prosecution’s taxable profits and tax due calculations.
We were able to demonstrate that both the income was overstated and expenses understated resulting in reduced taxable profits, that enabled the sentencing amount to be reduced to below £100,000, resulting in a suspended sentence.